SteveD wrote:dtb wrote:SteveD wrote:Welcome to the forum GAZ. :)
:shock:
I can tell you that the amp most definately would not have come directly from us with scuff marks, no documentation or accessories. . :)
You know thats not true Steve.
Grace would have brought you up to speed regarding my case and Marshall admitted they had sent these out to me.
I think you may also be aware of the same thing that happened to another person with a JVM, they also recieved a letter saying it was a mix up with a trade show unit. So it does and has happened, direct from Marshall.
You would have seen sight of the two you sent out to me, they were trashed. One speaker was loose inside, the tolex had rips all over it . The amp looked like it had gone 20 rounds with a bull mastiff. We took no chances and video taped the whole thing.
Why would I 'know' that's not true? As far as I was aware, the company I work for takes great pride in ensuring customer satisfaction with the product. Why wouldn't it? What is to be gained by deliberately sending stuff out in the condition that yours arrived in?
It's not Grace's job to bring me up to speed with anything regarding sales because she works in marketing and I work in R&D. I am not aware of any of the other issues like this either, I am not quality control.
Trade show models are a separate stock altogether so I really am surprised at this.
beginning to end of the Marshall production line and it is very thourough because if we don't get it right the first time it would cost more money to take a second time.
We will always look after the customer and there are several people who will bear witness to this.
As a customer, your name was mentioned in the letter Marshall sent me regarding this whole episode. I contacted you direct regarding this issue to see if there was the possibility of dealing with it in-house and away from the dealer. I stated in my ramblings to you, that I would not bring this issue up on the forum as I'm well away that molehills turn into mountains, but we now have another three case's where this has happened ( not including any in this post, which I suspect are dealers palming off demo stock ).
I have no intrest in output trannies. It may have been a one off, but its irrelvent to this issue.
My concens are based around answers. Why did two boxed amps in the same batch on the same manifest to the same dealer contain well used knackered 2266c's ? . I was told off record that these amps had come back from the London Music Show by both the dealer and Marshall. So who in Marshall is packing old 2007 made 2266C's into a box without footswitch, mains leads, paperwork, then placing heat shrink around the outside of the box and then shipping them out to dealers as new stock ?
These are the answers that would allow me to visit Marshall and collect a new boxed amp.
Call it paranoia, but I have spent ( Grace is well aware of this ) four months trying to buy one of these amps, but NOT one dealer I contacted would order one direct from Marshall, they all wanted to sell me their demo stock. I found one dealer prepared to order the amp. I dont touch demo gear because I dont know its history, and when I'm spending over £700 I want new as in shiney pin new, virgin....dressed in white new.
So you can imaging my face when my new special order from Marshall arrived, it had been around the block more times then a hooker doing happy hour. To add insult to injury , the next bloody amp was even worse.
You dont have to sell me a Marshall or its customer service. I love Marshalls and I find Marshalls ethos and customer handling first class.
I just want Marshall to find the muppet at MK who is packing these amps and sack the idiot.
Until then I am stuck with a bloody Mesa, how do you think that makes me feel