Moderator: longfxukxnhair
Which is probably why Slash uses the VM/AFD/JCM 800 With the VM's detail dimed it really gets a hint of the AFD's #34 tone and can cover nearly the same percentage of tone area. Hit the mid boost and dial some highs in and you can get a kind of AFD tone.Soulcaster wrote:I would agree the VM is the only Marshall I've heard that can come close to the AFD's sound.
Peace
See the thing is the VM has so many options on how it can be set up via the body & detail knobs that you can get near many amp tones just based on how you can change that voice. So while an out of the box average combo VM might not sound like a AFD100 a VM 2466 100 watt Head with a V30 cab & cranked balls out may get pretty damn close!. Of course no two amps are identical sounding 100%, especially if you're going to a/b them side by side. There is a margin of error I like to employ when comparing amplifier tones, if I were to tell Gearheads in the audience that I was using a AFD100 I'm sure I could fool them with my VM rig.Mats A wrote:The VM and the AFD are two quite different sounding amps. And the VM with mid boost is not very AFD sounding i think.
Seconded. Having owned both (and I still own the AFD), they are nothing alike. The attack and feel is different as well.Mats A wrote:The VM and the AFD are two quite different sounding amps. And the VM with mid boost is not very AFD sounding i think.
I absolutely agree with you!Soulcaster wrote:I don't think anyones sayin they sound the same. They do sound different, nothing I've heard can emulate the AFD, and thats the way I'd like it to stay tbh. But saying that, as an AFD owner, the only (un-modded)amp I've heard that I thought came close is a VM, thats my humble opinion anyway.
Peace
[youtube][/youtube]Slashwannabe1 wrote:Soulcaster wrote:I don't think anyones sayin they sound the same. They do sound different, nothing I've heard can emulate the AFD, and thats the way I'd like it to stay tbh. But saying that, as an AFD owner, the only (un-modded)amp I've heard that I thought came close is a VM, thats my humble opinion anyway.
Peace
Richard_H wrote:[youtube][/youtube]Slashwannabe1 wrote:Soulcaster wrote:I don't think anyones sayin they sound the same. They do sound different, nothing I've heard can emulate the AFD, and thats the way I'd like it to stay tbh. But saying that, as an AFD owner, the only (un-modded)amp I've heard that I thought came close is a VM, thats my humble opinion anyway.
Peace
/quote]
That's as close to the #34 sound that I've heard with an amp that's not an AFD100. Well done!
I love my VM but dont think I get any closer to the AFD then with any of the others I have/had.Slashwannabe1 wrote: I think regardless of this clip, people with an AFD100 will come in and say its vastly different just to say it sounds different from their signature amp, but I still think I came scary close for an amp thats supposed to be "nothing like" an AFD100 or #34 Slash amp. I'm not saying its dead on, but I think my clip at least proved that they can sound alike.
I bought mine for #34 mode and compressed is not a word I would use when describing either mode, in fact quite the opposite.Mats A wrote:+1 on that gtrman. Actually i don´t think it´s that hard getting close to Slash tone with a Marshall and a Les Paul. I also think most AFD buyers buy it for the AFD and not the #34 tone. The VM has a much more open sound than the AFD wich is more compressed and less crunchy. Playing Slash licks also helps in getting it to sound similar.
Thanks man :)gtrman wrote:I love my VM but dont think I get any closer to the AFD then with any of the others I have/had.Slashwannabe1 wrote: I think regardless of this clip, people with an AFD100 will come in and say its vastly different just to say it sounds different from their signature amp, but I still think I came scary close for an amp thats supposed to be "nothing like" an AFD100 or #34 Slash amp. I'm not saying its dead on, but I think my clip at least proved that they can sound alike.
Probably most Marshall Tube amps can get close if you dial it close enought and VERY important - have a Les Paul with the pickups you have.
My guess is your guitar have maybe just as much if not more to do with you getting close ... and your playing as well.
Great job btw .. its sounds great
Actually that was one of the things I thought of as a difference when trying to get as close as possible to that Slash tone and I agree with you, I would also describe & say that the VM is more open than the AFD clips that I've heard.Mats A wrote:+1 on that gtrman. Actually i don´t think it´s that hard getting close to Slash tone with a Marshall and a Les Paul. I also think most AFD buyers buy it for the AFD and not the #34 tone. The VM has a much more open sound than the AFD wich is more compressed and less crunchy. Playing Slash licks also helps in getting it to sound similar.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests